arisbe: (Default)
[personal profile] arisbe
I ended my last more personal post with the rhetorical question, Wouldn't you rather be reading about Iraq? And one of you responded No!

Well, I will continue to post interesting things I find out there in Cyberspace, but I will also say something about my own little life.

First, some housekeeping. The pruning of my friends list continues. The criteria are the same. If you post a great many long, long entries without cuts, requiring me to scroll, scroll, scroll down to the next entry, you are history. If you are always posting images that either my family or my business associates might consider obscene or pornographic, easygoing as I am, do consider using cut tags. If course it's your right to post what you like, but it's also my right, and sometimes my preference or even my obligation, not to look at it at my office or my living room.

I finally made it to Master and Commander, though to my great frustration I missed the first five or ten minutes and don't know how the characters were established. I'm sorry guys, drop me if you like, but this was so much better than The Return of the King in every way. The use of music was particularly effective, especially the Tallis variations which provide the leitmotif for the more ultimate moments.

Yes, the Doctor was too young, and lighter and taller than I imagined him, and I don't see this conception being carried into films of the more interesting novels, in which he has a more leading role.

Sunday's Theosis class was called on account of foul weather, our discussion of The Unseen Warfare postponed until February. But at the coffee hour I was able to share my enthusiasm for a pamphlet of President Kelly of Earlham, Reality of the Spiritual World. I found the link Friday, while looking for something else -- in fact the pamphlet by Wilmer Cooper with the wonderful quotation on integrety I couldn't help sharing. Kelly's Testament of Devotion was a particular favorite of St. Michael's last web master, and this shorter work is quickly becoming a favorite of mine. I can only compare it with Evelyn Underhill's retreats and practical works, but Kelly's voice is somehow clearer, more vivid and passionate, reminding me of Josiah Royce's Sources of Religious Insight.

It seems odd that Kelly says he can make nothing of the doctrine of the Trinity, and so must leave it alone. Yet he conveys such a clear sense of God Transcendent, God Immanent, and the Cosmic Christ as somehow essentially related and somehow distinct, that I wonder what he thought the Greek Fathers were going on about.

But as I read Kelly's description of the habitual life of prayer, I realized that his sort of Quaker is some sort of Benedictine, an Oblate, to be precise, who follows Chrysostom's advice to live a truly contemplative live in the world. And I recalled that Dorothy Day, very much a kindred spirit to the Society of Friends apart from prefering St. Michael's to the meetinghouse, was, precisely, a Benedictine Oblate, of St. Procopius' Abbey, which was, in her day bi-ritual, that is, celebrating according to the Byzantine as well as the Roman Rite.

Recall that Archimandrite Lev Gillet, who wrote as "A Monk of the Eastern Church," referred to himself as "a Quaker of the Eastern Rite," and would attend Friends Meeting when he couldn't serve Liturgy at an Orthodox Church. A man after my own heart. Especially in view of his day job, working for the Younghusband Foundation on interreligious relations with the Hindu and Buddhist cultural worlds.

In other news, I am a single parent for the next week, as Maya is back in Texas sorting out the things her mother left behind.

Date: 2004-01-20 11:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] godista.livejournal.com
children in small doses are all right, but more than that & I'd be done for.

As for Sir Kelly of Iowa supreme: the candidates, all of them, Kellysupreme included, can't seem to put their feet down on any singular issues, but jump about, here saying one thing, and there another--grotesque, really. Who can they please during this round of debates, how much prancing can they do and still get ahead in the votes. isscch.

Date: 2004-01-20 01:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] arisbe.livejournal.com
Only one child here. Female. 21.

As long as she doesn't wake me up coming back from the pool hall.

Date: 2004-01-20 11:53 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sophiaserpentia.livejournal.com
I agree that Master and Commander was very good, but I have a hard time comparing it to something as stylized and fantasized as Lord of the Rings. They are each superior in their own ways.

Date: 2004-01-20 01:01 pm (UTC)
lovecraftcomplex: Rose Lalonde scribbling on a Squiddles poster. (Default)
From: [personal profile] lovecraftcomplex
I haven't seen Master and Commander, and probably won't (I'm still having trouble getting over the fact that they called a movie about a bunch of men at sea "master and commander", like the naval adventure genre isn't already in danger of becoming a homoerotic farce), but I'd have trouble believing it wasn't better than RotK, which I just saw and mostly hummed through, fighting the desperate urge to turn to my friends and start chatting.

Watching computer generated people fight other computer generated people is just...boring. I think in the hour and half of battle scenes, there was one 15 second bit that actually made me go "Wow, that was incredible!"

As a kid who grew up on Star Wars and Indiana Jones, I hate to say it, but I really hope the fantasy/sci-fi blockbuster dies a quiet death soon. Surely they've almost mined that genre for all it's worth.

Date: 2004-01-20 01:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] arisbe.livejournal.com
I have to admit that I came back from RotK muttering I hates hobbitses into my Bourbon.

M&C was not homoerotic at all (RotK very much so) in spite of a great many opportunities, not only with the two protagonists, but with the young midshipmen, two of whom are good friends.

What is truly remarkable is that the issues of shipboard discipline are handled without a trace of sadomasochism. Which is, now that I think of it, hard to imagine.

In the books Jack and the Doctor are quite sexually active, heterosexually, that is, and in the later books their illegitimate children appear as adults.

I think the film is very much worth a look, and the books are worth a reading, though the level of detail drives me up the wall.

Date: 2004-01-20 04:22 pm (UTC)
lovecraftcomplex: Rose Lalonde scribbling on a Squiddles poster. (Default)
From: [personal profile] lovecraftcomplex
M&C was not homoerotic at all (RotK very much so) in spite of a great many opportunities, not only with the two protagonists, but with the young midshipmen, two of whom are good friends.</i. I'm sure it's not, it stars Russel Crowe afterall. It's just the name. And my twisted sense of humor. I'll check it out when it comes out on video. One of the things that really bugged me about RotK was the homoeroticism. It was totally unessecary to add it, it detracted from the ending, and furthermore it hints at this increasingingly prominent complex we have as a society in which we question the sexuality of any male who isn't acting out a violent warrior archtype. The hobbits were suppossed to be a metaphor for the small, peaceful, plain living farmer types who live a life pleasently free from Grand Things. And they went and gayed it all up. But mostly what bothered me was the endless battle scenes. Meh. Hollywood.

Profile

arisbe: (Default)
arisbe

March 2011

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
202122232425 26
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 18th, 2025 03:42 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios