Well, well, well. How did someone like you end up with the least common personality type of them all? In a group of 100 Americans, only 0.5 others would be just like you. You really are one of a kind... In fact, I do believe that that's one of the definitions for the word "FREAK."
Freak's not such a bad word to describe you actually.
You are deep, complex, secretive and extremely difficult to understand. If that doesn't scream "Freak!" I don't know what does. No-one actually knows the REAL you, do they?
You probably have deep interests in creative expression as well as issues of spirituality and human development.
You've probably even been called a "psychic" before, because of your uncanny knack to understand and "read" people without quite knowing how you do it. Don't fret. You're not actually psychic. That would make you special and you'll never accomplish that.
You're also quite possible the most emotional of them all, so don't take this all too hard. Nevertheless you most definitely have the strangest personality type and that's not necessarily a good thing.
*****************
If you want to learn more about your personality type in a slightly less negative way, check out this.
*****************
The other personality types are as follows...
Loner - Introverted Sensing Feeling Perceiving
Pushover - Introverted Sensing Feeling Judging
Criminal - Introverted Sensing Thinking Perceiving
Borefest - Introverted Sensing Thinking Judging
Almost Perfect - Introverted iNtuitive Feeling Perceiving
Loser - Introverted iNtuitive Thinking Perceiving
Crackpot - Introverted iNtuitive Thinking Judging
Clown - Extraverted Sensing Feeling Perceiving
Sap - Extraverted Sensing Feeling Judging
Commander - Extraverted Sensing Thinking Perceiving
Do Gooder - Extraverted Sensing Thinking Judging
Scumbag - Extraverted iNtuitive Feeling Perceiving
Busybody - Extraverted iNtuitive Feeling Judging
Prick - Extraverted iNtuitive Thinking Perceiving
Dictator - Extraverted iNtuitive Thinking Judging
|
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
arisbe
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2006-12-09 04:49 am (UTC)The four factor thing is obviously broken, and so are the links to the other type descriptions. Too bad -- I wonder what they have to say about INFP...
Actually, it's easy to fix the links to the other type descriptions; delete everything from the beginning up to the second "http". So, for example, this is the INFP link (http://www.okcupid.com/tests/describescore?testid=3076838567116464195&category=4).
Enjoy!
no subject
Date: 2006-12-09 06:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-09 01:35 pm (UTC)The problem with these kinds of quizzes -- even the problem with Myers-Briggs in general -- is that of perception and situation. The quiz asks, "do you people see you as more this or that," but that is often at variance with how I see myself, which makes my answers ambiguous. Likewise, the quiz asks for absolute answers, as in "In social situations, do you do this or that," but I want to ask, "in which social situations?"
I am an introvert, which makes me dread many social situations; however, I am also a clergyman, and I have great facility in handling many social situations -- but this is all skill, not preference.
In the end, quizzes like this are fun, but I think Myers-Briggs is about as useful as a kettle of lutefisk.