Lewontin's Fallacy

[arisbe]

"A proper analysis of human data reveals a substantial amount of information about genetic differences. What use, if any, one makes of it is quite another matter. But it is a dangerous mistake to premise the moral equality of human beings on biological similarity because dissimilarity, once revealed, then becomes an argument for moral inequality. One is reminded of Fisher’s remark in Statistical Methods and Scientific Inference 'that the best causes tend to attract to their support the worst arguments, which seems to be equally true in the intellectual and in the moral sense.'" -- A.W.F. Edwards, "Human genetic diversity: Lewontin’s fallacy" (.pdf).

Comments

[arisbe.livejournal.com]

Sojourner Truth, Karl Fisher, and AWF Edwards are all on the same page with Mr. Jefferson, that we are all equal in the sense that there are some things that you just can't do (morally, I mean) to a human being, and this has nothing to do with race, religion, or IQ.

Gould seems to have been a pretty dishonest scholar, but that's how you become rich and famous. A classic review is here:
http://www.eugenics.net/papers/rushton.html
But note the author (as I'm sure you have noted the URL):
http://www.eugenics.net/papers/nolib.html
Not somebody you would quote in polite academic company!

Nor AJN either, though a little Nock is always welcome.

[lhasa7.livejournal.com]

Thanks for those links. I have a sort of instinctive agreement with the folks you mention on that moral issue, though I’m just beginning to try to sort out my thinking on the subject (these days I am hoping that revisiting Christianity, which I departed from at the onset of adolescence, might help for me). While I greatly admire Nock, I’ve never quite been able to swallow his line of thinking in ‘Are All Men Human?’
http://alumnus.caltech.edu/~ckank/FultonsLair/013/nock/human.html