The author of this essay makes two annoying errors in logic that I feel obligated to comment upon.
The first is that liking women is not in itself proof that someone does not like men too. So, if President Buchanan was not exclusively gay, he might very well have been bisexual. Not everyone is a Kinsey 1 or a Kinsey 6.
The second is that anal sex is a small part of gay and bisexual reality.
no subject
Date: 2004-06-23 11:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-23 12:02 pm (UTC)http://www.straightdope.com/columns/040402.html
no subject
Date: 2004-06-23 12:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-23 02:09 pm (UTC)The first is that liking women is not in itself proof that someone does not like men too. So, if President Buchanan was not exclusively gay, he might very well have been bisexual. Not everyone is a Kinsey 1 or a Kinsey 6.
The second is that anal sex is a small part of gay and bisexual reality.
no subject
Date: 2004-06-24 07:04 am (UTC)How's the job hunt going?