Hoover vs. the Hoover Institution
"I told MacArthur of my memorandum of mid-May 1945 to Truman, that peace could be had with Japan by which our major objectives would be accomplished. MacArthur said that was correct and that we would have avoided all of the losses, the Atomic bomb, and the entry of Russia into Manchuria."
Two days after the dropping of the bomb, Hoover wrote, "The use of the atomic bomb, with its indiscriminate killing of women and children, revolts my soul."
[Via young Marcus Epstein.]
Two days after the dropping of the bomb, Hoover wrote, "The use of the atomic bomb, with its indiscriminate killing of women and children, revolts my soul."
[Via young Marcus Epstein.]
no subject
At the time, this was the "superbomb," seen more, I think as a matter of degree. I think it was the luxury of peace and self-examination, as well as further understanding of what nuclear proliferation meant that began to force us to realize that perhaps there were intrinsic ethical problems in the very use, if not existence, of these weapons. But that seems much more a function of hindsight and further experience and reflection to me. Without that understanding, I really begin to suspect that the "Should we have?/Shouldn't we have?" argument begins to function as a bit of a red herring, leading us away from what the real understanding of the times were.
By the way, is it okay if I add your journal to my list?
no subject
no subject